‘Print is not dead!’ and other insights from a journalism jobs pro

qbeats-blog-post-meetup-head-hunter-Lynne-Palmer-Executive-Recruitment-Inc

We are excited about our Meetup from last night with Jackie Riley, vice-president at Lynne Palmer Executive Recruitment In., a NYC search firm.

A crowd of local journalists attended to hear Jackie reveal what she is seeing in the journalism employment market.

Tips & Advice from Jackie:

1) Content is king. Employers are looking for top-shelf, grade A content. If you’re a journalist, employers only want those who are most attentive to detail and experienced.

2) You need to be the right fit. Are you applying to a company that you’re meant for? Don’t throw your resume at every opportunity. The more consideration you give into each position, the better your chances are of being selected for an interview.

3) The jobs are out there. According to Jackie there hasn’t been a slow down in her recruiting business.

Thank you to Jackie for coming out to share her knowledge of the market!

Advertisements

FIGHTING INNUMERACY–ONE JOURNALIST AT A TIME

qbeats-blog-post-fighting-innumeracy-one-journalist-at-a-time

Reporters generally are words people but they are working in an increasingly numbers world. That’s why we’re glad to spread the word about a new online course offered by the Knight Center. “Math for Journalists Made Easy: Understanding and Using Numbers and Statistics” is a free, self-paced massive open online course that aims to teach journalists how to use numbers to tell better stories and how to look at statistical data with a critical eye.

We think that’s a big plus. (And the improved numeracy could come in especially handy when they begin monetizing their work on qbeats!)

What is content monetization?

qbeats-blog-post-what-is-content-monetization

Information is the only commodity that remains unvalued today. At qbeats, we see the world as a place where journalists and content creators can profit from their craft. That’s why we’ve developed a content valuation engine a tool to empower the journalists and content creators.

What does Mayweather-Pacquiao bout say about potential of PPV?

qbeats-blog-post-MayPac-Greg-Josyln

By Greg Joslyn.

Weighing in at well over 3 million viewers, tomorrow night’s broadcast of the welterweight title fight between Floyd “Money” Mayweather Jr. and Manny “Pac-Man” Pacquiao will shatter the record for pay-per-view. The previous record was Mayweather’s 2007 match against Oscar De La Hoya, which fetched 2.48 million PPV viewers.

Mayweather’s take—his 60% cut of the PPV proceeds, ticket sales and any number of ancillary sources of revenue—could top $200 million. “Money” indeed!

So what is it about championship boxing that makes it a natural for PPV and what are the takeaways for the rest of the media industry?

  • Quality sells. While heavyweights typically command the most interest—think Ali v. Frazer or Holyfield v. Tyson—this matchup between an undefeated “boxer” (Mayweather) and a lefty slugger (Pacquiao) has captured the imagination of fans around the world.
  • Specialization sells. The Super Bowl has broad appeal, with 100s of millions of casual fans tuning in—some for the game, some for the halftime show and some … for the commercials. It’s no wonder the big game follows a traditional advertising model. Soccer’s World Cup or the Olympics are weeks-long spectacles with viewers–who at any other time wouldn’t be caught dead watching Greco-Roman wrestling or Paraguay v. Ghana–checking in and out. They would lose serious momentum if they tried PPV. But a discrete, high-quality event with a relatively modest but passionate fan base? Boxing is a PPV no-brainer and owners of other specialized content would do well to take note.
  • Flexibility sells. In the U.S., Mayweather v. Pacquiao is being carried jointly by HBO and Showtime, two cable rivals whose historical animus evidently is trumped only by their appetite for cash. No doubt the fight promoters pushed the strange bedfellows together in the interest of reaching the widest possible audience on cable. A wise–and lucrative–move.

But wouldn’t greater flexibility sell even more? What if the owners of this premium content had a way to maximize their PPV reach to include any device in the world with an Internet connection?  Early estimates for the PPV audience were close to 4 million, but experts subsequently tempered that forecast when they factored in piracy. Doubtless most pirates simply want to avoid paying $100 to watch the fight on cable. But it is safe to assume that some percentage of them don’t have access to Showtime or HBO and, thus, have no other options. Would some of them swear off their pirating ways and pay to watch if only they could?

Similarly, might some demographically desirable viewers agree to answer a few questions about themselves and then watch highly targeted ads between rounds in lieu of the $100 PPV fee?

And, finally, about that $100—who’s to say it’s the right price? Wouldn’t a more sophisticated approach set the pricing dynamically to maximize revenue across all different distribution channels?

Win or lose, Money Mayweather will do just fine tomorrow night, so long as he avoids Pac-Man’s left hook and the Vegas casinos after the fight … But he might have done even better.